Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
DHS Report on Treatment of ICE Detainees
A December 2006 DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit report addresses compliance with U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement Detention Standards at five detention facilities.
CA11 Finds Habeas Proceedings Appropriate Means for Challenging the Existence of a Removal Order
CA11 held that INA §242(a)(5),making a petition for review the “sole and exclusive” means of review of an order of removal, does not apply where the existence of a removal order is challenged. The court remanded to the district court for habeas proceedings. (Madu v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 12/1/06)
CA7 Remands for “Federal Felony Approach,” but Rejects §209(c) Waiver
CA7 found that because it had adopted the “hypothetical federal felony approach,” Petitioner’s heroin possession conviction would not bar asylum. It also upheld the determination that Petitioner was no longer a refugee eligible to adjust status under INA §209(c).(Gutnik v. Gonzales, 11/29/06)
CA2 Holds Pre-Conviction Time Served Counts Toward §212(c)’s Five-Year Bar
The court held that Petitioner was ineligible for relief under former INA §212(c) because he served more than five years for an aggravated felony, including pre-conviction detention. (Spina v. DHS, 11/28/06)
CA9 Holds No Abuse of Discretion in BIA’s Refusal to Reissue Decision
The court held that where the BIA complied with its own regulations when serving its notice of decision, it did not later abuse its discretion in refusing to reopen proceedings and reissue the decision despite Petitioner’s allegation of nonreceipt. (Singh v. Gonzales, 11/28/06)
CA8 Upholds Constitutionality of REAL ID’s Elimination of Habeas Review
The court held that INA §242(a)(2)(D), which permits judicial review of all constitutional claims and questions of law in removal proceedings, is an adequate and effective substitute for habeas review to test the legality of a person’s detention. (Mohamed v. Gonzales, 11/27/06)
CA3 Finds No Constitutional Right to Asylum and Upholds IJ’s Asylum Denial
The court held that there is no constitutional right to asylum and noted that given the discretionary nature of asylum, Petitioner’s argument that the delay violated due process must fail at the threshold. (Mudric v. Gonzales, 11/24/06)
CA9 Holds Stop-Time Rule of INA §240A(d)(1)(B) May Not Be Applied Retroactively
The court held that part B of the permanent stop-time rule of INA §240A(d)(1) may not be applied retroactively to stop the accrual of continuous residence for an individual who pleaded guilty before the enactment of IIRAIRA. (Sinotes-Cruz v. Gonzales, 11/22/06)
CA1 Holds §212(c) Cannot Waive Deportability for a “Crime of Violence”
The court upheld the BIA’s approach in Matter of Brieva, and held that Petitioner, who was deportable for having committed a crime of violence, was ineligible for §212(c) relief because there is no counterpart ground of exclusion. (Kim v. Gonzales, 11/16/06)
BIA Holds Failure to Post Bond Not Same as Failure to Depart
The BIA held that failure to post voluntary departure bond does not make respondent subject to penalties for failure to depart under §240B(d)(1) and granted the motion to reopen proceedings for further consideration of cancellation of removal. Matter of Diaz-Ruacho, 24 I&N Dec. 47 (BIA 2006)
CA1 Holds Adjustment Granted by INS Outside Proceedings Invalid
The court found no due process violation in refusing Petitioner a hearing on whether his status was lawfully adjusted by INS, because he was in proceedings at the time the application was granted and should have filed with the IJ. (Dar-Salameh v. Gonzales, 11/15/06)
CA9 Holds AZ Domestic Assault Statute Does Not Categorically Involve Moral Turpitude
The court held that Arizona’s misdemeanor domestic assault statute requires neither the willful intent nor the type of injury that is necessary for domestic assault to qualify as a categorical crime involving moral turpitude. (Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 11/15/06)
CA2 Overturns IJ’s Finding that Albanian Failed to Show Past Persecution
The court noted that a minor beating or any physical degradation designed to cause pain or other suffering may rise to the level of persecution if it occurred in the context of an arrest or detention on the basis of a protected ground. (Gjolaj v. BCIS, 11/9/06)
CA7 Holds Reinstatement of Removal Trumps §245(i) Adjustment of Status
The court held that INA §241(a)(5), which provides for reinstatement of a prior order of removal for illegal reentrants, plainly bars a previously removed individual who has illegally reentered the U.S. from adjustment of status under INA §245(i). (Lino v. Gonzales, 11/6/06)
CA9 Remands Motion to Reopen Involving Vacated Conviction
The court held that the BIA erred in placing the burden on Petitioner of proving his conviction was vacated due to a substantive or procedural defect and was therefore, no longer valid for immigration purposes. (Nath v. Gonzales, 11/3/06)
CA3 Finds Pattern of Persecution of Eritrean Pentecostals
The court found that the record suggested a pattern or practice of persecution of Pentecostals in Eritrea and that the IJ committed legal error in finding that Petitioner could not prevail on his CAT claim because his claim for asylum was denied. (Ghebrehiwot v. Atty. Gen., 11/3/06)
BIA Rules REAL ID Only Applies to Applications Filed Affer Effective Date
The BIA held that REAL ID provisions apply only to relief applications initially filed with an asylum officer or IJ on or after 5/11/05 – not to an asylum application filed with an asylum officer prior to this date but subsequently renewed. In re S-B-, 24 I&N Dec. 42 (BIA 2006)
CA2 on Delivery Presumption for Challenging In Absentia Orders
The court held that for purposes of challenging an in absentia removal order, a presumption of receipt attaches to an NTA that is properly addressed and sent according to normal office procedures. (Silva-Carvalho Lopes v. Gonzales, 11/2/06)
EOIR Memo on Procedures for Automatic Stay Cases
EOIR memo sets forth procedures for handling automatic stay cases pursuant to a final rule effective 11/1/06. The final rule directs IJs to issue written custody decisions in automatic stay cases within 5 business days. An additional 5-day extension can be requested from the BIA.
CA2 Remands Due to New Documents on Forced Sterilization
The court found that despite earlier rulings, documents presented in a recent case suggest that there may in fact be an official policy of forced sterilization in the Fujian province, which may undermine the reliance of DOS reports. (Lin v. Gonzales, 10/30/06)
ICE Releases Revised Procedures for Automatic Stay of Custody Decisions by IJs
Obtained via FOIA by Hoppock Law Firm, ICE released guidance and procedures for the use of the revised automatic stay provision contained in 8 CFR § 1003.6(c) and § 1003.19(i) pursuant to DOJ's final rule issued on 10/2/06. Special thanks to Matthew Hoppock.
CA9 Holds “Crime of Domestic Violence” Must be Intentional to Establish Removability
The court held that Petitioner was not removable for a “crime of domestic violence” because he was convicted under a statute which proscribes “reckless” as well as intentional conduct and the record does not establish that his conduct was knowing. (Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 10/26/06)
AILA Liaison/EOIR Q&As (10/18/06)
The EOIR provides answers to AILA Liaison agenda item questions from an 10/18/06 meeting. Topics include the complaint process for IJ conduct, EOIR policies regarding unaccompanied minor children, corroboration of asylum claims, filing at the BIA and Matter of Liadov, and more.
EOIR Announces 10 New Legal Orientation Programs
EOIR announced that six new Legal Orientation Program (LOP) sites for adults, and four sites for children, will become operational within the next few months to assist detained individuals in immigration court proceedings.
CA2 Remands Issue of Whether Two Children in China Is a Basis for Asylum
The court remanded the question of whether having more children than Chinese law allows, standing alone, may serve as a basis for asylum, noting that the question is not clearly answered by the statutory definition of refugee. (Shao v. BIA, 10/12/06)