Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
AAO Declares Bond Breached When Subject Failed to Appear
AAO dismissed the obligor’s appeal, upholding the breach of a $3,500 delivery bond after the obligor failed to present the bonded alien for removal.
BIA Says Physical Presence Can Accrue After Service of OSC
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that the required period of continuous physical presence can be accrued after service of an Order to Show Cause in suspension of deportation cases.
BIA Finds No Jurisdiction Over Motion to Remand
The BIA held that where an alien files a motion to remand during the pendency of an appeal from an IJ's denial of a motion to reopen and more than 90 days have passed since entry of the final administrative decision, the motion is time-barred. (Matter of L-V-K-, 8/10/99)
BIA on Duty of IJ to Provide Information on Voluntary Departure
The BIA held that if the record does not indicate that an alien has been convicted of an aggravated felony or charged with deportability under INA 237(a)(4), the IJ has a duty to provide the alien with information about voluntary departure. (Matter of Cordova, 8/6/99)
EOIR Correction on Deadline for NACARA Motions to Reopen
EOIR published a correction notice announcing that the actual due date for motions to reopen NACARA cases is 11/18/99. The original notice specified a set number of days for the deadline, but not an actual date. (64 FR 42146, 8/3/99)
BIA on Commencement of Proceedings for VWP Travelers
The BIA held that under 8 CFR §217.4(a)(1), proceedings against an alien who has been refused admission under the Visa Waiver Program and who has applied for asylum must be commenced with a Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge (Form I-863). (Matter of Kanagasundram, 7/29/99)
EOIR Provides Deadline to File NACARA Motions to Reopen
EOIR notice that individuals who filed an abbreviated motion to reopen their cases, on or before 9/11/98, in order to apply for benefits under NACARA, must complete the motion to reopen within 150 days from 6/21/99. (64 FR 40389, 7/26/99)
BIA on MTRs Based on Changed Circumstances
The BIA held that aliens seeking to reopen exclusion proceedings to apply for asylum or withholding based on changed circumstances who meet the general requirements for MTRs need not demonstrate "reasonable cause" for failure to appear. (Matter of A-N- & R-M-N-, 7/23/99)
AILF-AILA Comment to May 21 NACARA Rule
AILF and AILA submitted a joint comment letter July 15, 1999 to the INS interim rule on NACARA.
BIA on Timing of MTRs Following Judicial Review
The BIA held that a motion to reopen a decision of the Board following judicial review is untimely if it is filed more than 90 days after the date of the Board's decision, even if the motion is filed within 90 days of the order of the court. (Matter of Susma, 6/24/99)
INS Notice on Corrected Interim Rule on NACARA
INS notice concerning an omission in the interim rule published 5/21/99 about applicants for suspension of deportation and special rule cancellation of removal for certain nationals of Guatemala, El Salvador, and former Soviet bloc countries. (64 FR 33386, 6/23/99)
BIA Rejects Domestic Violence/Political Opinion Claim
The BIA held that where a victim of domestic violence fails to introduce meaningful evidence that her husband's behavior was influenced by his perception of her opinion, she has not demonstrated harm on account of political opinion or imputed political opinion. (Matter of R-A-, 6/11/99)
BIA Says Misprision of a Felony Is Not an Aggravated Felony Under INA 101(a)(43)(S)
The BIA held that misprision of a felony is not an aggravated felony obstruction of justice offense under INA 101(a)(43)(S). (Matter of Espinoza-Gonzalez, 6/11/99)
BIA Says False Statements to Asylum Officer Is False Testimony
The BIA held that for purposes of INA 101(f)(6), false oral statements under oath to an asylum officer can constitute false testimony as defined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Phinpathya v. INS. (Matter of R-S-J-, 6/10/99)
BIA on Foreign Policy Grounds of Deportability
The BIA held that a letter from the DOS Secretary stating reasonable and bona fide reasons for finding that the alien's presence would have serious foreign policy consequences is sufficient evidence that the alien is deportable under INA 241(a)(4)(C)(i). (Matter of Ruiz-Massieu, 6/10/99)
BIA on Discretion to Grant Voluntary Departure
The BIA held that although an alien who applies for voluntary departure under INA 240B(a) or (b) must establish that a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted, the IJ has broader authority to grant relief before the conclusion of proceedings. (Matter of Arguelles-Campos, 6/7/99)
EOIR Response AILA Seminar Questions
Responses from EOIR to questions prepared by Royal Berg and Maureen O'Sullivan at the AILA Town Meeting in March 1999. The responses were prepared 6/7/99 by EOIR Acting General Counsel Chuck Adkins-Blanch.
BIA Says INS Met Burden of Establishing Deportability of Minor
The BIA found that the INS met its burden of establishing a minor's deportability where (1) Form I-213 was submitted; (2) the respondent made no challenge to its admissibility; and (3) admission of the Form I-213 would not be fundamentally unfair. (Matter of Ponce-Hernandez, 5/28/99)
BIA on Mandatory Detention of LPRs
The BIA held that an LPR will not be considered "properly included" in a mandatory detention category when the IJ or the BIA finds that it is substantially unlikely that the INS will prevail on a charge of removability. (Matter of Joseph, 5/28/99)
BIA on Espionage Grounds of Deportability
The BIA held that INA 241(a) does not require that the alien engaged in an act of espionage or was convicted of an espionage offense; knowledge of, or having received instruction in espionage or counter-espionage of a foreign government is sufficient. (Matter of Luis-Rodriguez, 5/26/99)
INS Proposed Rule on Public Charge Grounds
INS proposed rule establishing clear standards governing a determination that an alien is inadmissible or ineligible to adjust status, or has become deportable, on public charge grounds. (64 FR 28676, 5/26/99)
BIA Upholds Matter of Arthur on Motions to Reopen
The BIA held that Matter of Arthur, which requires an approved immediate relative visa petition before a case may be reopened for AOS is not inconsistent with the motions to reopen regulations at 8 CFR §§3.2(c)(2) and 3.23(b)(4)(i). (Matter of H-A-, 5/25/99)
BIA Says IJ May Grant Public Charge Waiver
The BIA found that IJs have jurisdiction to grant a waiver of inadmissibility under INA 213 and are required to advise an alien found to be inadmissible as a public charge under section 212(a)(4)(B) of his or her right to apply for a waiver. (Matter of Ulloa, 5/24/99)
BIA Says In Absentia Motion Must Be Filed with the IJ
The BIA lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an in absentia order in removal proceedings because INA 240(b)(5)(C) provides that such an order may only be rescinded by filing a motion to reopen with the IJ. (Matter of Guzman-Arguera, 5/24/99)
BIA Finds INA 275 Is Not an Aggravated Felony
The BIA held that an alien convicted of an offense described in INA 275(a) is not convicted of an aggravated felony under section 101(a)(43)(N), which specifically refers to alien smuggling offenses described in INA 274(a)(1)(A) and (2). (Matter of Alvarado-Alvino, 5/24/99)