Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA8 Holds That It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review VAWA Cancellation Denial
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the decision to deny VAWA cancellation, finding that the petitioner’s argument was actually challenging how the BIA weighed the relevant factors. (Hamilton v. Holder, 6/5/12)
NBC Practice Alert: Proving EAD Eligibility for Applicants in Removal Proceedings (Updated 7/14/14)
AILA NBC Liaison Committee practice alert informing members of the type of evidence that may be submitted to demonstrate that an applicant in removal proceedings, including proceedings that have been administratively closed, is eligible for an EAD.
EOIR Releases FOIA Service Center Proactive Disclosure Policy
EOIR released its proactive disclosure policy including the four categories of agency records that must routinely be made “available for public inspection and copying.”
Immigration Law Advisor, May 2012 (Vol. 6, No. 5)
Immigration Law Advisor, a legal publication from EOIR, with an article on applying timing rules in immigration proceedings, as well as circuit court decisions for April 2012, recent BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.
DOJ OIL May 2012 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL) May 2012 Litigation Bulletin where the Supreme Court deferred to BIA’s interpretation that imputation is not available to applicant for cancellation and other issues related to adjustment of status and other decisions.
DOJ Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress
DOJ semiannual report to Congress from the Office of the Inspector General on developments from 10/1/11 to 3/31/12, including a section on the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
TRAC Report on Prosecutorial Discretion by Location
Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) report showing that as of 5/31/12, a total of 4,585 cases were closed under a special ICE program where the number of cases closed due to prosecutorial discretion (PD) was up from 2,609 as of the end of March 2012.
IJ Grants Administrative Closure under Avetisyan in DOMA Case
In an unpublished decision, the IJ granted respondent’s request to administratively close the case over objection by the government. The case implicates DOMA, and the IJ agreed that admin closure was appropriate until the BIA decides Dorman. Courtesy of Bryon Large.
EOIR Releases Language Access Plan
EOIR released its plan for ensuring limited English proficient persons have meaningful access to EOIR services. This Legal Action Plan (LAP) provides a detailed summary of EOIR’s current efforts to ensure meaningful access to LEP persons and an analysis of language access at EOIR.
CA7 to Rehear Asylum Case on Particular Social Group En Banc
The court ordered that Cece v. Holder – a decision in an asylum case which held the petitioner’s proposed social group lacked the required common, immutable characteristic - be reheard en banc. (Cece v. Holder, 5/31/12)
DHS Proposes New “Social Distinction” Test in Asylum Case
DHS proposed a new "social distinction” test for asylum cases in its brief in Valdiviezo-Galdamez, on remand from a Third Circuit decision which rejected the BIA’s "social visibility" and "particularity" tests for determining if a particular social group exists.
ICE Statistics on Prosecutorial Discretion - May 29, 2012
ICE statistics on prosecutorial discretion, as of May 29, 2012, provided to AILA, including the number of cases reviewed, number of cases identified for a grant of PD, number of cases granted deferred action and stays of removal.
CA8 Remands Case for CIMT Analysis Under Silva-Trevino
Applying the “realistic probability” analysis set forth in Silva-Trevino, the court concluded that the petitioner’s conviction for providing a false name to a peace officer was not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. (Bobadilla v. Holder, 5/29/12)
Law Professors on Executive Action for DREAMers
A 5/28/12 letter from law professors addressing issues that may arise as agencies and officials within the Executive Branch consider various administrative options in cases involving potential beneficiaries of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act.
CA4 Upholds Matter of Rojas on Mandatory Detention under § 236(c)
The court found that the petitioner is subject to mandatory detention under § 236(c), despite the fact he was not taken into federal custody immediately upon his release from state custody. (Hosh v. Lucero, 5/25/12)
CA11 Strikes Down Post-Departure Bar Regulation
The court held that the departure bar in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d), which prohibits the BIA from considering a motion to reopen filed by a noncitizen who is outside of the U.S., impermissibly conflicts with the INA § 240(c)(7)(A). (Lin v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 5/23/12)
CRCL Newsletter, May 2012
DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) May 2012 newsletter with information on Secure Communities, Asian-Pacific American Heritage month and more.
CA11 Remands §209(c) Waiver Denial
The court found that the IJ and BIA erred by failing to consider country conditions in Sudan and the hardship the petitioner would suffer if removed when they denied his waiver application under INA § 209(c). (Makir-Marwil v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 5/22/12)
CA3 Says Re-entry Did Not Start New Period of Continuous Residence
The court held that the petitioner was not eligible for cancellation because a drug offense triggered the stop-time rule, and that a new period of continuous residence did not start when he re-entered the U.S. after a two-day trip. (Nelson v. Att’y Gen., 5/22/12)
Supreme Court Says Child Cannot Rely on Parent’s Status and Residence to Establish Cancellation Eligibility
The Court upheld the BIA’s interpretation of the criteria for cancellation of removal, holding that a noncitizen living in the U.S. as a child cannot count his parent’s years of residence or time as a LPR to satisfy §240A(a). (Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, 5/21/12)
CA7 on Tolling of 90-Day Period for Filing a Motion to Reopen
The court held that a motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the BIA’s initial dismissal of an appeal, regardless of whether a motion to reconsider is pending. (Sarmiento v. Holder, 5/21/12)
Administration Misses Opportunity to Protect Immigrants Held in Detention
New regulations issued by DOJ exclude immigrants in DHS facilities from the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA). AILA believes this was a missed opportunity to protect the estimated 400,000 individuals held in immigration detention facilities each year.
IJ Grants Asylum to Liberian Woman Captured During War
In an unpublished decision, the immigration judge held that the respondent demonstrated that she suffered past persecution in Liberia on account of her membership in the particular social group of Liberian women who were captured during the war and used as sex slaves.
CA11 Finds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Battered-Spouse Determination
The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to review whether the petitioner was “battered or subjected to extreme cruelty” for the purposes of §240A(b)(2), holding that it is a discretionary determination. (Bedoya-Melendez v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 5/17/12)
Presidential Memo on Prison Rape Elimination Act
Presidential memorandum expressing Obama Administration's conclusion that PREA applies to all Federal confinement facilities, including those operated by executive departments and agencies other than DOJ, whether administered by Federal Government or a private organization.