Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
AILA Amicus Briefs on the Categorical Approach and State Drug Convictions
AILA amicus brief and supplemental brief arguing that, under the categorical approach, courts must assess indivisibly overbroad controlled substance statutes categorically, and that the identity of a substance is a means, not an element, of the offense.
BIA Orders Consideration of Eligibility for Provisional Waiver
Unpublished BIA decision remands record for consideration of request for administrative closure and eligibility for unlawful presence waiver. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ayebae, 5/1/14)
DOJ OIL May 2014 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for May 2014, with articles on the BIA’s recent decisions on particular social groups, as well as information on the Adverse Credibility Project and summaries of circuit court decisions for May 2014.
CA1 Declines to Review Asylum Denial for Sikh Petitioner from India
The court denied the petition for review, affirming the BIA and IJ’s conclusions that the petitioner lacked a well-founded fear of future persecution, given his ability to move to Delhi and remain in India for several months without further harassment or arrest. (Singh v. Holder, 4/30/14)
CA1 Agrees with BIA that Petitioner’s Third Motion to Reopen (MTR) Was Untimely
The court held the BIA acted within its discretion in finding that the petitioner’s third MTR was untimely, noting that petitioner did not demonstrate due diligence relating to his in absentia removal order to permit consideration of equitable tolling. (Wang v. Holder, 4/30/14)
VOICE: May 2014
In the May 2014 VOICE, learn about the appeal of an SB-1 visa, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s gross misconduct at the northern and southern borders of the United States, the basics of sending employees to work in Australia, and more!
BIA Orders Further Consideration of Adjustment Application
Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings in light of evidence submitted on appeal indicating respondent’s conviction involved less than 30 grams of marijuana, making him eligible to adjust status with a 212(h) waiver. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Gamanga, 4/29/14)
BIA Holds Tennessee Burglary Offense Not an Aggravated Felony
Unpublished BIA decision terminating proceedings, finding that Tennessee Code 39-14-401 is not an aggravated felony because the statute includes vehicles in its definition of “habitation” and the record did not clarify what type of habitation was subject of the conviction. Courtesy of James Spokes.
ICE ERO Does Not Require Detainees’ Signatures on G-28s
ICE has informed AILA that ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) no longer requires a detained foreign national’s signature on Form G-28. If you encounter a local office that still requires a detainee signature, please notify the AILA ICE Liaison Committee.
CA9 Vacates Removal Order for Petitioner with Hawaii Conviction
The court vacated the removal order, finding the petitioner was not categorically removable under INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i) because the Hawaii statute of conviction criminalized at least two substances that were not listed by the CSA. (Ragasa v. Holder, 4/28/14, amended 6/4/14)
Removal Without Recourse: The Growth of Summary Deportations from the United States
The American Immigration Council’s Immigration Policy Center released a report titled “Removal Without Recourse: The Growth of Summary Deportations from the United States,” on the increase in use of expedited removal and reinstatement of removal.
AILA Interagency Committee Meeting Minutes (4/25/14)
Minutes from the 4/25/14 AILA Interagency Liaison Committee meeting with EOIR, USCIS, and ICE. Topics include provisional waiver adjudications, I-130 petitions and biometrics appointments for individuals in proceedings, misrepresentation waivers under INA §237(a)(1)(H), and U visa coordination.
BIA Reopens Proceedings In Light of Totality of Circumstances
Unpublished BIA decision grants motion to reopen in light of lack of DHS response, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, and potential eligibility for relief from removal. (Matter of Reyes, 2/25/14) Special thanks to IRAC.
BIA Finds Failure to Prepare Affidavit of Support Constitutes Ineffective Assistance
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent established a prima facie case of ineffective assistance based on allegations that prior attorney failed to prepare and submit Form I-864 in connection with adjustment application. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Kurgat, 4/25/14)
BIA Finds N.Y. Attempted Second Degree Gang Assault Not CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision terminates proceedings and holds New York attempted second degree gang assault is not a CIMT because the offense is “legally impossible” for trial purposes. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Clase, 4/25/14)
BIA Holds “Legally Impossible” Offense Not CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision terminates proceedings and holds New York attempted second degree gang assault is not a CIMT because the offense is “legally impossible” for trial purposes. Courtesy of Ben Winograd. (Matter of Clase, 4/25/14)
CA1 Declines to Review Asylum Denial for Petitioner from Nepal
The court denied the petition to review the asylum denial, finding that the record evidence did not amount to past persecution, even though the Maoists also may have threatened the Nepali petitioner with a gun during the isolated event. (Thapaliya v. Holder, 4/24/14)
TRAC Report Finds ICE Rarely Uses Prosecutorial Discretion to Close Immigration Cases
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) report finding that the use of prosecutorial discretion by ICE to close cases in the immigration courts continues to be relatively rare; only 6.7% of cases were closed on this basis between October 2012 and March 2014.
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Because Adult Did Not Receive Hearing Notice
Unpublished BIA rescinds in absentia order under Flores-Chavez v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2004), because the respondent was a juvenile and no adult was notified of the hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Rojop-Hernandez, 4/23/14)
CA1 Declines to Reopen Removal Proceedings for Sri Lankan Asylum Seeker
The court denied the petition to review the denial of the second motion to reopen, finding petitioner did not show that evidence of Sri Lanka’s history of torturing returned asylum seekers was unavailable and undiscoverable at the time of her removal proceedings. (Perera v. Holder, 4/22/14)
EOIR Asylum Statistics FY2009-FY2013
EOIR released asylum statistics broken down by fiscal year and nationality for FY2009 through FY2013.
CA1 Declines to Review Asylum Denial for Colombian Petitioner
The court held that the Colombian petitioner did not establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution and thus found the petitioner’s asserted social group of widows of slain narco-traffickers moot. (Moreno v. Holder, 4/18/14)
EOIR Electronic Databases Functional Again (Updated 5/19/14)
EOIR update that their electronic databases are functional again but that they are continuing recovery efforts on other applications including eRegistration.
AILA Quicktake #70: DACA Renewals
As many of the first young immigrants who applied for DACA are looking at renewal, AILA Immediate Past President Laura Lichter shares important information about the upcoming process.
CA9 Declines to Review Asylum Denial for Chinese Petitioner
The court found that under In Re J-S-, as a spouse of a victim of a forced abortion or sterilization, a reasonable factfinder would not be compelled to find that the petitioner either resisted China’s one-child policy or had suffered persecution. (He v. Holder, 4/17/14)