Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
BIA Holds Detainees Awaiting Reinstatement Eligible for Bond Hearings in Ninth Circuit
Unpublished BIA decision holds that detainees awaiting the reinstatement of a prior removal order are eligible for bond hearings under Rodriguez v. Robbins, 715 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2013), if detained for more than six months. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Quezada, 4/4/14)
USCIS Extension of Comment Request on Form I-821D (Updated 4/15/14)
USCIS 30-day extension of information collection on Form I-821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. Comments are now due on 5/5/14. USCIS correction issued to add e-Docket ID, due date remains unchanged. (79 FR 18925, 4/4/14) (79 FR 21257, 4/15/14)
CA8 Declines to Review Asylum Denial for Chinese Christian
The court denied the petition to review the asylum denial, finding that the IJ did not violate the petitioner’s right to due process because the Mandarin Chinese interpreter provided at the hearing was competent. (Yang v. Holder, 4/4/14)
CA1 Declines to Review MTR for Christian Indonesians Seeking Asylum
The court denied the petition to review the motion to reopen (MTR) the asylum denials, finding that Christian Indonesian petitioners failed to demonstrate error sufficient to warrant reopening of their removal proceedings. (Marsadu v. Holder, 4/4/14)
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Because Counsel Was Not Notified of Hearing
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia removal order where respondent’s prior counsel submitted statement saying he did not receive hearing notice, noting respondent acted diligently in seeking reopening. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Foster, 4/3/14)
AILA's Recommendations on 2015 Appropriations
AILA’s recommendation on appropriations for fiscal year 2015, with focus on the detention bed quota, the number of detention beds, alternatives to detention and immigration courts.
AILA's Take on Detention
AILA’s take on detention, with a specific focus on ending the detention bed quota, affording due process to those who are detained, and encouraging the greater use of alternatives to detention.
The Myth of Immigration 'Non-Enforcement'
AILA background document detailing how the country has seen a dramatic increase in enforcement under President Obama’s administration. Includes graphs on DHS removals, numbers of individuals in detention, number of ‘no-process’ removals, and federal criminal prosecutions for immigration violations.
EOIR Comment Request on Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form
EOIR 60-day comment request on the Immigration Practitioner Complaint Form, used by individuals who wish to file a complaint against an immigration practitioner authorized to appear before the BIA and the immigration courts. Comments will be accepted until 6/2/14. (79 FR 18581, 4/2/14)
AILA Amicus Urges Court to Hold Asylum Is Available to Individuals Subject to Reinstatement
AILA amicus brief filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that any noncitizen arriving or physically present in the U.S. is eligible to apply for asylum notwithstanding whether he has returned after removal or departure under a removal order.
DACA SOP for Form I-821D and Form I-765
The National Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Forms I-821D and I-765, prepared by the Service Center Operations Directorate. Manual is dated April 4, 2013, version 2.0 and was provided to AIC and NILC in response to a FOIA request.
MPI Report on Reconciling Tough and Humane Enforcement
Migration Policy Institute (MPI) April 2014 report analyzing current pipelines for removal and key trends in border and interior apprehensions, deportations and criminal prosecutions, and examining policy levers the Obama administration has to influence deportation policies, practices, and results.
DOJ OIL April 2014 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for April 2014, with articles on persecution in relation to political affiliation and social groups as well as the application of IIRIRA’s reinstatement provision. The bulletin also contains recent circuit court decisions and EOIR statistics for FY2013.
AILA Amicus Brief in First Circuit on Mandatory Detention Under §236(c)
AILA amicus brief filed with the First Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that mandatory detention under INA §236(c) does not apply to noncitizens taken into immigration custody well after being released from the predicate criminal custody.
CA7 Declines to Review Untimely Motion to Reopen
The petitioners sought to reopen their removal proceedings to administratively close their case and seek a provisional waiver of their inadmissibility, and the court denied the petition for review, as the motion to reopen the asylum denial was untimely. (Patel v. Holder, 4/1/14)
CA9 Remands for BIA to Determine Whether California Assault Crime is a CIMT
The en banc court granted the petition for review and remanded for the BIA to determine in the first instance whether California Penal Code §245(a)(1), assault with a deadly weapon other than a firearm, constituted a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Ceron v. Holder, 3/31/14)
CA9 on INA §241(a)(5)
The court denied the petition, holding that the application to petitioner of the reinstatement statue was not impermissibly retroactive, because he had taken no action to vest any right he may have initially had to renew his application for adjustment of status. (Ortega v. Holder, 3/31/14)
BIA Orders Further Consideration of Adjustment Application under 245(i)
Unpublished BIA decision remands for further consideration of adjustment application under section 245(i) where IJ should have accepted partially complete evidence and failed to analyze positive and negative equities. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Hernandez, 3/31/14)
BIA Holds Virginia Grand Larceny Not a Theft-Related Aggravated Felony
Unpublished BIA decision holds grand larceny under Va. Code 18.2-95 is not a categorical theft-related aggravated felony because the statute can be applied to fraud offenses, but that the statute is divisible under Descamps. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ramirez, 3/31/14)
BIA Reopens and Terminates Proceedings After Post-Departure Bar Struck Down
Unpublished BIA decision reopens and terminates proceedings in light of DHS non-opposition following remand from First Circuit decision striking down post-departure bar in 8 CFR 1003.2(d). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Perez, 3/31/14)
CA3 Says Pennsylvania Indecent Assault Conviction Is an Aggravated Felony
The court found the BIA reasonably determined that “indecent” contact referred to in the PA indecent assault statute categorically constituted molestation, and by extension, sexual abuse of a minor, and found petitioner removable under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(iii). (Cadapan v. Att'y Gen., 3/30/14)
BIA Holds North Carolina Assault on Female Not a CIMT or Crime of Domestic Violence
Unpublished BIA decision holds assault on female under N.C. Stat. 14-33(c)(2) is not a categorical CIMT or a crime of domestic violence, and that the statue is not divisible under Descamps v. U.S., 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Jurado, 3/28/14)
BIA Faults IJ For Incorporating By Reference to DHS Brief
Unpublished BIA decision remands record where IJ issued summary decision incorporating by reference the reasoning in the DHS brief. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Yang, 3/28/14)
BIA Grants Remand After Filing of U Visa Application
Unpublished BIA decision grants motion to remand over DHS opposition in light of filing of U visa petition supported by approved law enforcement certification. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ramos, 3/28/14)
BIA on “Lawful Status” Requirement and Renewed Adjustment Applications
Unpublished BIA decision states that applicants who renew adjustment application in removal proceedings need not have maintained “lawful status” if requirement was met when application was originally filed with USCIS. (Matter of Lee, 3/27/14) Special thanks to IRAC.