Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CARA: Government Continues to Undermine Access to Counsel and Due Process for Children and Mothers Seeking Protection in the U.S.
The CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project shared additional evidence that the federal government and private prison companies are failing to provide child care adequate to ensure access to counsel and meaningful representation as a Texas agency considers licensing the Dilley center.
AILA: Shameful Escalation of ICE Raids is Misdirected at Vulnerable Families and Engenders a Culture of Fear
Responding to confirmed reports that immigration authorities are planning another surge of arrests aimed at families and unaccompanied children across the nation, AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis joined AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson in condemning the raids.
BIA Cautions IJs over Finding Relief Applications Abandoned
Unpublished BIA decision states that while immigration judges may deem applications abandoned if not timely submitted, such decisions must be balanced against due process concerns that respondents have a full and fair hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ramirez Ramos, 5/12/16)
BIA Dismisses Fraud-Related Aggravated Felony Charge
Unpublished BIA decision terminates proceedings because the evidence did not demonstrate that a restitution order exceeding $10,000 related to an offense involving fraud or deceit or to a separate conviction for grand theft. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Acevedo Solis, 5/11/16)
CA9 Says It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Discretionary Denial of NACARA Special Rule Cancellation
The court granted the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the petition for review, holding that it lacked jurisdiction pursuant to INA §242(a)(2)(B)(i) to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of NACARA special rule cancellation of removal. (Monroy v. Lynch, 5/11/16)
CA1 Finds BIA Failed to Explain Why It Found That VAWA Relief Required Good Faith Marriage
The court held that the BIA failed to articulate a sufficient explanation as to why it determined that the petitioner was required to prove that hers was a good faith marriage in order to be eligible for VAWA relief. (Tillery v. Lynch, 5/11/16)
CA1 Finds Petitioner’s Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Did Not Comply with Lozada Requirements
The court dismissed in part and denied in part the petition for review, holding that there is no “plain on the face of the administrative record” exception in favor of a case-by-case assessment of whether BIA’s application of Matter of Lozada was arbitrary. (García v. Lynch, 5/9/16)
USCIS Comment Period on Form I-191
USCIS 60-day notice of a comment request period on proposed revisions to the Application for Relief Under Former Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Form I-191). Comments are due by 7/8/16. (81 FR 28097, 5/9/16)
AILA Amicus to BIA on Prostitution as a CIMT
The AILA Amicus Committee filed an amicus brief with the BIA, arguing that simple prostitution is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT).
BIA Says Circumstance-Specific Approach Applies to Limiting Components of INA §101(a)(43)(T)
The BIA held that the circumstance-specific approach is the appropriate inquiry for assessing the limiting components of INA §101(a)(43)(T), which defines aggravated felony “failure to appear” convictions. Matter of Garza-Olivares, 26 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2016)
AILA Quicktake #165: Texas Approves Karnes Childcare License
AILA member and head of the immigration clinic at the University of Texas Law School Denise Gilman shares news of the Texas Department of Family Services' decision to approve the Karnes City, Texas, application to be a licensed childcare facility and what AILA members can do.
CA7 Finds INA §242(a)(2)(C) Limits Its Jurisdiction to Review Petitioner’s Claims
The court held that the IJ and BIA properly found that the petitioner, who was convicted of burglary in Illinois, was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and thus that INA §242(a)(2)(C) applied and limited the court’s scope of review. (Dominguez-Pulido v. Lynch, 5/5/16)
CA7 Remands Withholding of Removal and CAT Claim of Former Salvadoran Gang Member
The court granted the petition for review, holding that the IJ erred in finding that there was “no credible evidence” that petitioner, a Salvadoran with ties to the Mara Salvatrucha gang, would face a clear probability of persecution if returned to El Salvador. (Arrazabal v. Lynch, 5/4/16)
CA5 Remands for BIA to Analyze Petitioner’s Conviction Under the Minimum Reading Approach
For the reasons explained in Mercado v. Lynch, the court held that the BIA erred in applying the “realistic probability” approach to hold that the petitioner’s Texas conviction for deadly conduct was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Hernandez v. Lynch, 5/4/16)
CA5 Says the “Realistic Probability” Approach Does Not Apply in the CIMT Context
The court reversed and remanded, holding that BIA erred in applying the “realistic probability” approach in analyzing whether petitioner’s convictions for indecent exposure and making terroristic threats under Texas law are crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMTs). (Mercado v. Lynch, 5/4/16)
CA5 Transfers Case Due to Genuine Issue of Material Fact About Petitioner’s Nationality
The court transferred the case to a U.S. district court for a hearing and decision on petitioner’s nationality claim with regard to whether he benefits from INA §309(c), which governs the transmission of citizenship to “person[s] born ... out of wedlock.” (Hernandez Rosales v. Lynch, 5/3/16)
CA11 Says Noncitizens Whose Removal Orders Are Reinstated May Not Apply for Asylum
The court denied the petition for review, finding that INA §241(a)(5) renders noncitizens whose removal orders are reinstated ineligible to apply for asylum. (Jimenez-Morales v. Att'y Gen., 5/2/16)
Immigration Law Advisor, April 2016 (Vol. 10, No. 3)
The April 2016 issue of Immigration Law Advisor, a legal publication from EOIR, includes an article on the intercountry adoption process, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions from March 2016 and BIA precedent decisions.
BIA Says Failing to Appear for Service of Sentence Is an Aggravated Felony
The BIA held that an "offense relating to a failure to appear by a defendant for service of sentence" is an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(Q) if the underlying offense was "punishable by" imprisonment for a term of five years or more. Matter of Adeniye, 26 I&N Dec. 726 (BIA 2016)
DOJ OIL May 2016 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for May 2016, with articles on Torres v. Lynch and the Adverse Credibility Project, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for May 2016.
DOD Fact Sheet on MAVNI Recruitment Pilot Program
DOD fact sheet on the Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) recruitment pilot program. To determine its value in enhancing military readiness, the limited pilot program will recruit up to 5,200 people in FY2016, and will continue through September 30, 2016.
BIA Provides Additional Opportunity to Comply with Biometrics Requirement
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent who forgot to submit fingerprints should receive another opportunity to comply with the biometrics requirements and present her asylum application. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of L-H-A-, 4/29/16)
BIA Remands Record Due to Insufficient Evidence of Offense of Conviction
Unpublished BIA decision remands record because DHS submitted only a computer printout of the respondent’s conviction in support of the charge of deportability that did not list the elements of the offense. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Martinez, 4/29/16)
Sign-On Letter to Attorney General Lynch on Appointing Counsel to Children
On 4/29/16, AILA joined faith-based, human rights, and immigrants’ rights groups in urging Attorney General Loretta Lynch to halt the practice of pursuing deportation proceedings against children who do not have counsel and to guarantee that every child facing deportation is provided legal counsel.
Written Testimony from ICE Director Sarah Saldana on Criminal Aliens
Written testimony from Sarah Saldana, Director of ICE, for the 4/28/16 hearing “Criminal Aliens Released by the Department of Homeland Security” before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where she discussed ICE enforcement and removal operations.