Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA9 Reaffirms California First-Degree Burglary as an Aggravated Felony
The court held that Petitioner’s conviction of first-degree burglary is an aggravated felony as established by the state court’s abstract of judgment. The court also rejected Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. (Kwong v. Holder, 12/7/11)
BIA Says Adjustment under Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act Is an Admission
The BIA held that the respondent was admitted to the U.S. when he adjusted status under the Cuban Adjustment Act, and was thus subject to removal under INA § 237(a) following a drug trafficking conviction. Matter of Espinosa Guillot, 25 I&N Dec. 653 (BIA 2011)
CA5 on Habeas Statute Custody Requirement
The court found that the petitioner, who had been deported to Mexico pursuant to a final order of removal, was not considered “in custody” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Merlan v. Holder, 12/6/11)
TRAC Report Finds ICE is Targeting Fewer Criminals in Deportation Proceedings
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) found that of ICE deportation proceedings initiated during July through September 2011, only 13.8% of the individuals were charged with having engaged in criminal activities.
CA4 Upholds Adverse Credibility in Cameroonian Asylum Claim
Over dissent, the court upheld the adverse credibility finding based on the inconsistency arising from Petitioner’s eviction notice suggesting she was not in hiding as she claimed and the omission in her application of her role in the SCNC. (Djadjou v. Holder, 12/5/11)
CA1 Upholds Denial of I-751 Hardship Waiver
The court upheld the IJ’s adverse credibility determination and conclusion that Petitioner’s marriage was not entered into in good faith where petitioner and his ex-wife gave vastly divergent descriptions of their wedding day. (McKenzie-Francisco v. Holder, 12/5/11)
CA3 Says BIA Erred in Making Unqualified Conclusions on CAT “Acquiescence”
The court found that the BIA incorrectly concluded that a number of specific circumstances cannot constitute government acquiescence and that it improperly ignored evidence of the likelihood of torture. (Pieschacon-Villegas v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 12/5/11)
EOIR Announces Additional Features to 1-800 Number
EOIR announcement that the case information system (1-800 number) will reinstate the “pound” key (#) and “star” key (*) functions beginning 12/12/11.
BIA Grants Cancellation of Removal to Mother of Four
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that exceptional and extremely unusual hardship would occur for the respondent’s four young children if she was removed, noting the respondent would lose her job and support network and had no savings. Courtesy of Campbell Cooke.
BIA Finds NTA Without Hearing Date Triggers “Stop-Time” Rule
The BIA held that any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence ends upon service of an NTA on the alien, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing. Matter of Camarillo, 25 I&N 644 (BIA 2011)
CA4 on Jurisdiction over BIA Remand for Voluntary Departure
The court found jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order remanding for a grant of voluntary departure, but prudentially declined to exercise jurisdiction in light of Dada and 8 CFR §1240.26(b)(1)(i)(D). (Li v. Holder, 12/2/11)
CA4 Grants Petition for Review in Eritrean Asylum Case
In an unpublished decision, the court vacated the BIA order, noting the IJ committed multiple legal and factual errors constituting an abuse of discretion, including engaging in speculation and failing to consider corroborating evidence. Courtesy of David Goren.
Denver EOIR Notice on Prosecutorial Discretion Pilot Project
Notice from Alec Revelle, Court Administrator, Denver EOIR, to respondents whose hearings are to be rescheduled in order to effectuate the prosecutorial discretion pilot project.
DOJ OIL November 2011 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL) November 2011 Litigation Bulletin addresses the Third Circuit’s rejection of “social visibility” and “particularity” requirements for asylum applicants, summaries of recent federal court decisions, issue updates, and more.
ICE Secure Communities Statistics Through November 30, 2011
ICE Secure Communities Monthly IDENT/IAFIS Interoperability statistics through 11/30/11 released on the ICE FOIA electronic reading room.
House Judiciary’s Immigration Subcommittee Hearings on Secure Communities
Testimony from the 11/30/11 House Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement Hearing, "Is Secure Communities Keeping Our Communities Secure?"
AILA NY Chapter Testimony on Secure Communities
AILA New York Chapter testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement for the 11/30/11 hearing on Secure Communities.
AILA Southern California Chapter Testimony on Secure Communities
AILA Southern California Chapter testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement for the 11/30/11 hearing on Secure Communities.
AILA DC Chapter Testimony on Secure Communities
AILA DC Chapter testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement for the 11/30/11 hearing on Secure Communities.
AILA Testimony on Secure Communities Submitted to House Immigration Subcommittee
AILA testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement for the 11/30/11 hearing on Secure Communities.
CA9 Finds No Abandonment of AOS Where Petitioner Departed without Advance Parole
Over dissent, the court found that where Petitioner unintentionally drove into Mexico without advance parole, he did not abandon his NACARA adjustment of status because 8 CFR §245.13(k)(1) applies only to “desired” departures. (Lezama-Garcia v. Holder, 11/30/11)
BIA Finds Respondent is Eligible for Cancellation Under 240A(b)
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that the respondent’s five U.S.-citizen daughters would suffer from exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if he was removed to a small village in Mexico and his family of seven accompanied him. Courtesy of Jonathan Benson.
CA3 Finds Pennsylvania Sexual Assault Is a Crime of Violence
The court held that sexual assault, in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3124.1, raises a substantial risk of the intentional use force and is therefore an aggravated felony crime of violence under 18 USC §16(b). (Aguilar v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 11/29/11)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Religion-Based MS-13 Claim
The court found insufficient evidence that MS-13 targeted Petitioner on account of his Christian beliefs, finding instead that the evidence supported the conclusion that the threats were based on his refusal to join the gang. (Bueso-Avila v. Holder, 11/29/11)
CA5 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review Termination of Asylum
The court found that termination of asylum under 8 CFR §208.24 does not “mark the consummation of a decision-making process” and is therefore, not a final agency action for purposes of APA jurisdiction. (Qureshi v. Holder, 11/28/11)