Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
9,051 - 9,075 of 13,037 collection items
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 on Ineffective Assistance and Derivative Citizenship

The court found that the appellant’s attorney failed to research the appellant’s derivative citizenship defense before advising him to plead guilty to falsely claiming U.S. citizenship and to an illegal re-entry charge. (U.S. v. Juarez, 2/24/12, revised 2/29/12)

2/29/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022744. Crimes, Naturalization & Citizenship, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Violation of California Penal Code § 647(b) is CIMT

The court found that the petitioner’s conviction in California for disorderly conduct involving prostitution was a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and that the petitioner was deportable for having been convicted of two CIMTs. (Rohit v. Holder, 2/29/12)

2/29/12 AILA Doc. No. 12030563. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Says IJs May Decline to Make Frivolousness Finding

The court held that an IJ can find that a noncitizen filed a frivolous asylum application even when the noncitizen has withdrawn her application, but also held that an IJ retains discretion to decline to make a frivolousness finding. (Zheng v. Holder, 2/27/12)

2/27/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022741. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Policy Memo on Facilitating the Return of Certain Removed Aliens

A 2/24/12 policy memo from John Morton describing ICE’s policy for facilitating the return to the United States of certain lawfully removed aliens whose petitions for review are granted by a U.S. Court of Appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court. Courtesy of Maria Baldini-Potermin.

2/24/12 AILA Doc. No. 12030260. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 on Notice and Stop-Time Rule

The court held that the notice requirements of the INA were satisfied by a combination of two notices, and that once sufficient notice is provided, the stop-time rule is triggered notwithstanding any defects in subsequent notices. (Guamanrrigra v. Holder, 2/24/12)

2/24/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022447. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 on False Claims of Citizenship on Form I-9

The court found the petitioner, who argued he had intended to claim nationality, not citizenship, when he checked a box marked “citizen or national” on a Form I-9, failed to meet his burden of proving he did not falsely claim citizenship. (Crocock v. Holder, 2/23/12)

2/23/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022363. Adjustment of Status, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies

Report on UAC and Representation, Produced for the LOPC by the Vera Institute of Justice

The Vera Institute of Justice provides data on unaccompanied children, including initial hearing locations, hearing locations by admission year, length of time between initial MCH to IJ decision, case outcomes including representation status, and more.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Supreme Court Finds Federal Tax Offenses Qualify as Aggravated Felonies

The Court found that convictions for tax violations under 26 U.S.C. §§7206(1) & (2) qualify as aggravated felonies, holding that the convictions involved fraud and deceit, and that tax crimes are not excluded from INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i). (Kawashima v. Holder, 2/21/12)

2/21/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022163. Crimes, Removal & Relief

EOIR FY2011 Statistical Yearbook

The FY2011 Statistical Year Book from EOIR containing statistics on respondents’ cases by nationality, language, and disposition. In addition to the standard information, this year’s book includes pending caseload numbers broken down by immigration court.

2/21/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022161. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Files Amicus Brief on Social Visibility/Particularity Inquiries in Asylum Cases

AILA amicus brief filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the meaning of "particular social group" for asylum purposes, arguing that the "social visibility" or "particularity" tests should not constitute part of the social group inquiry.

2/21/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022365. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Files Amicus Brief on Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine

An AILA amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Bright v. Holder, which addresses whether courts can apply the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to a noncitizen who fails to respond to an ICE order to report for removal.

2/21/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022148. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Chapters File Amicus Brief in Padilla Retroactivity Case

An amicus brief, filed by the AILA South Florida and Central Florida Chapters in the Supreme Court of Florida, arguing that the holding in the Supreme Court case Padilla v. Kentucky applies to all pending and future state postconviction proceedings.

2/20/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022146. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

EOIR Notice of Meeting on Recognition and Accreditation

EOIR notice announcing it is considering changes to the regulations governing the recognition of organizations and accreditation of representatives, and will host public meetings on the issue. Registration information for meetings included. (77 FR 9590, 2/17/12)

2/17/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021667. Ethics, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Remands Humanitarian Asylum Case to IJ

In a case on remand from the Eighth Circuit, the Board found that further fact-finding may be necessary to determine whether the Albanian respondent should be granted humanitarian asylum based on past persecution. Matter of L-S-, 25 I&N Dec. 705 (BIA 2012)

2/17/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021748. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds California Conviction for Making Threats “With Intent to Terrorize” to be CIMT

The court held that a conviction for making threats “with intent to terrorize” in violation of California Penal Code § 422 is a crime involving moral turpitude. (Latter-Singh v. Holder, 2/17/12)

2/17/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022149. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Remands Asylum Case Based on Pro-Democracy Activities in US

In an unpublished decision, the Board remanded to the IJ to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that the Burmese authorities are aware, or may become aware, of the respondents’ protests with pro-democracy groups in the US. Courtesy of David Cleveland.

2/16/12 AILA Doc. No. 12031261. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA On Evidence Outside the Record in Aggravated Felony Case

The BIA held the petitioner could present evidence outside the record of conviction to show that a conviction was not an aggravated felony because it involved a small amount of drugs for no remuneration. Matter of Castro Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. 698 (BIA 2012)

2/14/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021449. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 on False Claims to Citizenship

The court found that the petitioner did not make a false claim to U.S. citizenship for purposes of INA §212(a)(6)(C)(ii) when he allegedly told the city police that his place of birth was Puerto Rico. (Castro v. Att’y Gen., 2/14/12)

2/14/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021662. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Remands 212(c) Case Due to Judulang v. Holder

The court found that the petitioner’s conviction was not a juvenile adjudication because he was charged as an adult, but remanded the case to the BIA to determine whether he was eligible for a 212(c) waiver in light of Judulang. (Rangel-Zuazo v. Holder, 2/13/12)

2/13/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021447. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Yale Law School Files Class Action Challenging Detainers

Class action lawsuit filed by Yale Law School’s Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic, challenging the use of immigration detainers in Connecticut. (Brizuela v. Feliciano, 2/13/12)

2/13/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022742. Crimes, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

Sign-On Letter to Secretary Napolitano Expressing Concerns on Prosecutorial Discretion

On 2/9/12, AILA joined immigrants’ rights organizations in requesting that DHS Secretary Napolitano make changes to implement an effective and fair prosecutorial discretion policy.

2/9/12 AILA Doc. No. 12022360. Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 on Continuous Physical Presence Requirement

The court found that the petitioner was not eligible for cancellation of removal because he had been subject to a “formal, documented process” sufficient to break continuous physical presence. (Gomez Zarate v. Holder, 2/9/12)

2/9/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021066. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements, Practice Resources

ICE Announces Creation of Public Advocate Position

ICE press release announcing Andrew Lorenzen-Strait as first-ever Public Advocate for ICE where he will help individuals in addressing complaints, inform stakeholders on ERO policies, facilitate communication, and advise ICE leadership on stakeholder findings.

2/7/12 AILA Doc. No. 12020725. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Petitioner Suffered Past Persecution as an Infant

The court found that the petitioner suffered past persecution as an infant in Guatemala where his indigenous family suffered severe persecution, and where the petitioner suffered deprivations directly attributable to the persecution. (Mendoza-Pablo v. Holder, 2/7/12)

2/7/12 AILA Doc. No. 12020767. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

District Court Orders Disclosure of DOJ Emails

The court ordered the government to disclose Department of Justice emails communicating the policy for returning immigrants who are wrongfully deported while their judicial appeals are pending. (NIP-NLG v. DHS, 2/7/12)

2/7/12 AILA Doc. No. 12021067. Removal & Relief