Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Sample Op-Ed for Immigration Raids
This sample op-ed can be submitted as is or it can be adapted to a particular regional experience. Use this article to make the case that immigration raids only point to the urgent need for comprehensive immigration reform – raids have not and will not solve the immigration crisis in the U.S.
BIA Holds Alien Returning to U.S. After Failed Canadian Refugee Application is "Arriving Alien"
The BIA held that an alien who leaves the U.S. and is admitted to Canada to seek refugee status has made a departure and thus is an arriving alien when returning after the denial of an application for refugee status in Canada. Matter of R-D-, 24 I&N Dec. 221 (BIA 2007)
Immigration Law Advisor, June 2007 (Vol. 1, No. 6)
Immigration Law Advisor with articles on the unsettled concept of firm resettlement as a bar to asylum and how EOIR motions are being governed by federal courts, court activity for May 2007, update on recent BIA precedent decisions, a legislative commentary on S. 1639, and a regulatory update.
Human Rights Watch Assesses the Impact of Deportation Policy
A July 2007 Human Rights Watch report entitled "Forced Apart: Families Separated and Immigrants Harmed by U.S. Deportation Policy" addresses the ways in which AEDPA and IIRAIRA have impacted immigrants and their families.
CA5 Holds Texas Hit and Run Constitutes a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude
The court held that Petitioner’s conviction for failure to stop and render aid following a fatal car accident in which he was involved under Texas Transportation Code §550.021 constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude. (Garcia-Maldonado v. Gonzales, 6/29/07)
CA5 Finds Jurisdiction to Issue Stays of Voluntary Departure
The court held that once the Attorney General has granted voluntary departure, the court has jurisdiction to stay the voluntary departure period to preserve the status quo pending its review of the underlying order of removal. (Sierra Vidal v. Gonzales, 6/27/07)
CA2 on Solicitation Where a Drug Crime Is the Intended Objective
The court held that Petitioner was inadmissible for a controlled substance violation as a result of his solicitation conviction under NY Penal Law §100.05(1), because the solicitation had a drug crime as its intended objective. (Mizrahi v. Gonzales, 6/27/07)
BIA Finds INA §237(a)(2)(E) Does Not Apply to Pre-enactment Convictions
The BIA held that an alien whose conviction precedes the effective date of INA section 237(a)(2)(E) is not “convicted of an offense under” that section and therefore is not barred from establishing eligibility for cancellation of removal. Matter of Gonzalez-Silva, 24 I&N Dec. 218 (BIA 2007)
CA2 Remands for Determination of Whether Defected KGB Agents Constitute PSG
The court noted that it was not its task to determine in the first instance whether “defected KGB agents” constitute a particular social group and remanded to the BIA. (Koudriachova v. Gonzales, 6/26/07)
CA3 Holds Stop-Time Rule Does Not Permit New Period of Continuous Presence to Begin Following Crime
For purposes of the stop-time rule, the court rejected the argument that the commission of a crime only ends one period of continuous presence and that a new one begins after the crime is committed. (Briseno-Flores v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 6/26/07)
Summary of Graham-Kyl-Martinez “Omnibus” Amendment
Summary of the Graham-Kyl-Martinez Amendment to S. 1639, which would impose mandatory detention and a permanent bar on relief for visa overstays, and would require a “touchback” prior to Z visa status, among other provisions.
CA9 Finds Jurisdiction Over Habeas Appeal Filed After REAL ID’s Enactment
The court held that a habeas petition is “pending” in district court within the meaning of §106(c) of the REAL ID Act, when the notice of appeal was not filed at the time the Act was enacted, but was filed within the 60-day period. (Singh v. Gonzales, 6/25/07)
CA5 Holds Reinstatement Not Impermissibly Retroactive as Applied to Spouse of LPR
CA5 held that reinstatement of a prior removal order was not impermissibly retroactive. Although Petitioner’s I-130 was approved pre-IIRAIRA, a visa was not available and thus there was no vested right to adjustment before IIRAIRA’s effective date. (Rosa v. Gonzales, 6/25/07)
CA5 Upholds Removal of Petitioner for Falsely Claiming U.S. Citizenship to Gain Private Employment
CA5 held that private sector employment is a “purpose or benefit” under the INA and thus a person who falsely claims U.S. citizenship in order to gain such employment is inadmissible under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) and removable under INA §237(a)(3)(D)(i). (Theodros v. Gonzales, 6/25/07)
BIA Discusses “Mixed Motive” Asylum Cases
The BIA held that under the REAL ID Act, in mixed motive asylum cases, race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion must be at least one central reason for the claimed persecution. Matter of J-B-N- & S-M-, 24 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2007)
CA9 Holds USC Grandchild is Not a Qualifying Relative for Cancellation of Removal
CA9 held that a U.S. citizen grandchild, in the lawful custody of non-citizen grandparents, does not meet the statutory definition of “child” for purposes of cancellation of removal, nor do they qualify by virtue of a de facto parent-child relationship. (Moreno-Morante v. Gonzales, 6/21/07)
CA3 Holds Husband May Stand in Shoes of Wife in Population Control Case
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that one spouse’s qualifications for asylum may be imputed to the other spouse in coercive population control claims. (Chen v. Att’y Gen. of U.S., 6/20/07)
CA2 Remands to Allow Petitioner to Respond to Administratively Noticed Facts
The court held that the BIA abused its discretion in denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen based solely on administratively noticed facts, without giving Petitioner an opportunity to rebut the inferences drawn from those facts. (Chhetry v. DOJ, 6/20/07)
CA5 Discusses 120-Day Clock for Naturalization Adjudications Under INA §336(b)
The court held that when a CIS naturalization examination is premature because the FBI check is not complete, the 120-day period of INA §336(b) does not begin to run until CIS receives the FBI’s “definitive response,” as required by 8 CFR §335.2(b). (Walji v. Gonzales, 6/19/07)
BIA Discusses Waivers of Inadmissibility for LPRs
The BIA held that a returning lawful permanent resident seeking to overcome a ground of inadmissibility is not required to apply for adjustment of status in conjunction with a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h). Matter of Abosi, 24 I&N Dec. 204 (BIA 2007)
CA11 Remands Denial of MTR by Chinese Asylum Applicant with 2 USC Children
The court held that in light of the record, it was arbitrary and capricious for the BIA to find that Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for asylum or withholding based on the birth of two children in the US. (Li v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 6/18/07)
CA3 Finds BIA Erred in Applying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
The court held that the BIA abused its discretion in denying the motion to reopen and used this case to “clarify the analytical framework for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings.” (Fadiga v. Att’y Gen. of U.S., 6/15/07)
CA5 Finds No Equal Protection Violation in Refusing to Give Effect to Foreign Expungement
CA5 held no equal protection violation in refusing to treat a foreign conviction, which had been expunged under England’s Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, in the same manner as it would have treated a conviction expunged under the FFOA. (Danso v. Gonzales, 6/15/07)
CA6 Remands Asylum Denial in Iraqi Case and Criticizes Conduct of IJ
The court held that, based on the IJ’s conduct and its effect on Petitioner’s ability to testify accurately, it could not conclude that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was based on substantial evidence. (Elias v. Gonzales, 6/15/07)
CA6 Finds Chinese Labor Activist Was Persecuted for His Political Opinion
In reversing the IJ, the court found that Petitioner was persecuted not merely as a striker protesting his potential loss of employment, but as a political activist attempting to expose corruption by government officials and to protect workers’ interests. (Bu v. Gonzales, 6/15/07)