Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
TRAC Report Shows Unlawful Re-Entry as Most Common Lead Charge
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) report finds that 18,552 new unlawful re-entry prosecutions were reported during the first half of FY2011, based on data from DOJ, making unlawful re-entry under 8 U.S.C. §1326 the most commonly recorded lead charge.
ICE Exercises Prosecutorial Discretion in Case Involving Same-Sex Spouse of USC
In a 6/10/11 joint motion, ICE Chief Counsel exercised its prosecutorial discretion by moving to administratively close proceedings against the same-sex spouse of a U.S. citizen with a pending I-130. The IJ granted the motion on 6/13/11. Courtesy of Lavi S. Soloway.
AILA Amicus Brief Urges BIA to Reconsider Administrative Closure Policy
AILA amicus brief urging the BIA to reconsider and modify its previous decisions requiring no opposition by either party before the immigration judge or BIA can administratively close a case.
BIA Addresses Whistleblowing as a Basis for Asylum
The BIA held that retaliation for opposition to state corruption may form the basis for a claim based on political opinion if, post-REAL ID, the actual or imputed anti-corruption belief was one central reason for the harm. Matter of N-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 526 (BIA 2011)
USCIS Asylum Division Memo on Notifying Certain Asylum Applicants How To Seek Release From Detention
USCIS Asylum Division memo dated 6/9/11 regarding updated information notification of ICE's parole guidelines to arriving aliens found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture, including copies of the updated information notification.
AILA Summary of Keep Our Communities Safe Act of 2011 (H.R. 1932)
AILA summary of the Keep Our Communities Safe Act of 2011 (H.R. 1932), a bill that would expand the use of immigration detention.
CA2 on Burden of Proof and Evidence of Good Faith Marriage
The court held that the burden is on the alien to prove a good faith marriage for waiver of the joint removal of conditions and that the IJ did not err in attaching significance to the couple’s post-marriage actions. (Boluk v. Holder, 6/7/11)
TRAC Report on the Growing Immigration Case Backlog Despite Additional Judge Appointments
Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) report finding that the number of cases awaiting resolution before the immigration courts reached a new all-time high of 275,316 by the end of May 2011, despite the addition of 44 new immigration judges to the bench.
EOIR Responds to AILA Regarding the Application of DOMA in Proceedings
A 6/6/11 letter from Juan P. Osuna, Director, EOIR, responding to a 4/6/11 letter from AILA and other organizations, stating that until the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is repealed or struck down EOIR will continue to apply DOMA as interpreted in the immigration context.
Grand Jury Indicts Couple on Charges Involving Domestic Servitude
Federal grand jury indictment charging a MD couple with forced labor conspiracy and harboring a domestic worker for financial gain. The indictment alleges the defendants procured a fraudulent B-1 visa to bring the victim to the U.S. to work as their domestic servant. (U.S. v. Edwards, 6/6/11)
DHS PIA for the Automated Threat Prioritization Web Service
DHS/ICE Privacy Impact Assessment describing the general functionality of the Automated Threat Prioritization (ATP) web service, which receives, processes, and transmits criminal history information about individuals who are the subjects of enforcement actions.
CA9 Says EAD Grant Does Not Confer Admission Status for Cancellation of Removal
The court held that the grant of work authorization pending the approval of adjustment of status does not confer admission status on an undocumented alien for purposes of calculating seven years continuous residence for cancellation. (Guevara v. Holder, 6/3/11)
CA9 on “Admitted in Any Status” for Cancellation of Removal
The court held that an approved I-130 Petition for Alien Relative does not confer admission status on an undocumented alien for purposes of showing seven years of continuous residence for cancellation of removal. (Vasquez de Alcantar v. Holder, 6/3/11)
BIA Says Arriving Aliens Subject to Expedited Removal May Be Placed in §240 Proceedings
The BIA held that DHS has the discretion to place arriving aliens in removal proceedings under INA §240, even if they may also be subject to expedited removal under INA §235(b)(1)(A)(i). Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M, 25 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2011)
USCIS Additional 30-Day Comment Request on Form I-212 Extension (Updated 6/2/11)
USCIS notice of an additional 30-day comment period on the extension of the validity of Form I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the U.S. after Deportation or Removal. Comments are due 07/05/11. (76 FR 31971, 6/2/11) (76 FR 14419, 3/16/11)
CA9 Says Reinstatement Does Not Apply to Petitioner Who Sought Relief Pre-IIRIRA
The court held that reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5) is impermissibly retroactive when applied to individuals who applied for discretionary relief prior to IIRIRA’s effective date. (Chay Ixcot v. Holder, 6/1/11)
DOJ OIL May 2011 Litigation Bulletin
DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL) May 2011 Litigation Bulletin covers the BIA’s clear error standard of review, the Supreme Court’s consideration of whether tax crimes other than tax evasion may be aggravated felonies, proposed changes to the EB-5 Program, and more.
DHS Annual Report on Immigration Enforcement Activities in FY2010
DHS Office of Immigration Statistics Annual Report released June 2011, finding that DHS made 517,000 apprehensions and removed 387,000 foreign nationals from the U.S. in FY2010. ICE detained approximately 363,000 foreign nationals.
PHR Report: Indefinite Detention in the U.S.
A Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) report on the use of indefinite detention in the national security and immigration contexts, finds that the harms endured by indefinite detainees are unconstitutionally punitive and violate domestic and international law.
BIA Dismisses Appeal of Derivative Spouse Who Cannot Independently Qualify for TPS
The BIA held that an alien seeking TPS as a derivative spouse must be from a state designated for TPS eligibility and found that the IJ properly denied the respondent’s application for TPS as a late initial registrant. Matter of Echeverria, 25 I&N Dec. 512 (BIA 2011)
CA9 Affirms Oh v. Gonzales, Says 30-Day Appeal Deadline Is Not Jurisdictional
Finding no ambiguity, the court refused to apply Brand X and Chevron deference to the BIA’s decision in Liadov and concluded that the 30 day deadline for appeals under 8 CFR §1003.38 is not jurisdictional. (Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder, 5/31/11)
CA2 Remands for BIA Clarification on the Concept of Legitimation
In a case involving a claim for derivative citizenship, the court remanded to the BIA to clarify how it interprets “legitimation” under INA §101(c)(1) and to explain how its understanding of legitimation applies to Jamaican law. (Watson v. Holder, 5/31/11)
CA2 Asks BIA to Reconsider Continuance for Arriving Alien
In a case involving an arriving alien adjustment of status, the court found that the BIA erred in denying Petitioner’s continuance on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate adjustment applications for arriving aliens. (Freire v. Holder, 5/27/11)
CA4 Says Inconclusive Conviction Record Is Insufficient to Meet Cancellation Burden
The court rejected the argument that Petitioner satisfied his burden of proof to demonstrate he had not been convicted of an aggravated felony by presenting an inconclusive, though complete, record of conviction. (Salem v. Holder, 5/24/11)
BIA Finds Conviction for Violating Kansas No-Contact Provision Is a Removable Offense
The BIA held that a conviction for violation of the no-contact provision of a protection order issued under the Kansas Protection from Abuse Act constitutes a removable offense under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(ii). Matter of Strydom, 25 I&N Dec. 507 (BIA 2011)